Trick Or Vote

Trick Or Vote

You are a Citizen. Exercise Your Right To Vote. Know all the Rights Your are Entitled of.

Learn More About Your Rights

trick or vote media
The most important office, and the one which all of us can and should fill, is that of private citizen.
Louis Brandeis
Featured

Can Social Media Affect Politics?

The Netherlands is representative democracy: citizens elect political representatives and they make decisions on their behalf. Citizens have final control because they can send their representatives away after some time. But citizens do not have a direct daily influence. Many find this hopelessly outdated.

Are you looking for the best tutors to explain politics? visit ‘TACHS tutor‘ for more details.

There is also an alternative: direct democracy. Citizens have a direct influence because they are asked to give their opinion in all kinds of decisions. Citizens then make their own decisions or do so together with politicians. This is an ideal that has often been put forward by a party like D66 in the past. Nowadays, the PVV is especially in favor of it. Many feel that this is more appropriate for this time.

DO CITIZENS MAKE THEIR VOICES HEARD?
Many citizens are present on all kinds of social media. These media have also become a medium for citizens to talk about politics. Yet the question is whether all citizens use social media equally for political matters. That is not true. On the internet, it is mainly the higher educated, men and young people who are politically active. When we listen to the opinions of citizens on the internet, we only listen to this part of the population. This is also known as ‘diploma democracy’: the higher educated get the chance to shout out the lower educated. The higher educated often have different opinions and interests than the less educated. They often also have different party preferences. It is therefore a problem if we start listening to ‘the citizen’ via social media.

IS THE CITIZEN’S VOICE HEARD?
Politicians in the Netherlands have become insecure. There are floating voters, declining party supporters, fewer volunteers, and many disaffected citizens. This creates a need to listen better to citizens, but listening is still not their main task. Most politicians have a part-time position. During that time they have to do many things: hold meetings, maintain party contacts, read documents, obtain information, and speak to the media.

WHAT ARE THE CONSEQUENCES?
The question, however, is what happens when politicians start listening to citizens. Politicians mainly come across a lot of irrelevant information online. Many opinions of citizens are not substantiated, many arguments of citizens were already known, there may be new information to be found, but filtering it out takes a lot of time, and there is no guarantee whatsoever that new information will come out of the statements of citizens at all.

IS DIRECT DEMOCRACY BETTER?
In a direct democracy, the same citizens are active who are active today in our representative democracy. The majority are not active and only sometimes vote. Many citizens are already tired when elections are held too often. Still, active citizens want to make their voices heard more often and advocate more direct democracy. However, this is primarily an opportunity to permanently overpower others. The existing problem of diploma democracy is getting worse. So there are many similarities between a representative and direct democracy. A small group of citizens is an active and real dialogue between citizens and politicians is scarce because it is physically impossible and there is simply a lack of time. Politicians also have to meet together. In a direct democracy, however, there is more pressure on politicians to enter into dialogue, and the chance that citizens will have influence increases. The question remains whether all citizens will make equal use of it. Probably not, and then the question still arises who exactly gets along with all those active citizens.

Featured

Work-Related Political Games That Are Dangerous

Dirty games are often played in the workplace, which can have a negative impact on the results of teamwork, especially in projects.

The political behaviors

1. Constantly blaming others
Clear communication by program and project leaders can prevent useless finger pointing. Pointing fingers and blaming someone else rarely leads to better results. Rather, it leads to shame, mistrust and hiding mistakes in the future

2. Only focus on the managers for the benefit of your career
Professionals at every level must demonstrate that they value the contributions of each employee. You don’t have to pay service to people because there are project leaders that also good in relationship management.

3. Form a barrier between management and the shop floor
Project leaders must encourage and circulate ideas and initiatives, no matter where they come from. Establishing barriers between management and employees is not in the interest of those involved. It is also good for the success of a project if a project leader can arrange meetings between managers and other employees.

4. Create conflict without a solution
At the start of each project, the project manager must communicate to have a clear expectations. This creates a team of critical thinkers who think ahead and focus on the success.

5. Benefit like-minded people
A project manager should avoid personal preferences as much as possible. Real progress and innovation often comes from allowing and stimulating other experiences. A professional should encourage diversity in approach in order to find the best solutions. But the focus should always be on the stakeholders.

6. Abuse of influence
Project leaders need to be close to the progress of initiatives, because things can suddenly take the wrong turn. A project manager has a responsibility to remind each party to limit their influence to serving the needs of those involved. Unresolved issues such as subtle sabotage and stealthy behavior can be very damaging at any level of the organization and destroy the outcomes of a project. The professional must work with clients and managers to address them immediately and eliminate them.

Watch: The Best Way to Play Office Politics

7. No reciprocity in sharing knowledge
Project leaders should convince all project participants of the benefits of sharing knowledge. They should also point out the risks to project goals if they do not. Project leaders can help allay the personal fear and uncertainty that often underlie keeping information to oneself.

8. Gossip and lies about others
This particular problem is difficult to counter because nonsense is, to some extent, a natural part of human nature as long as it is not destructive. It is important for project managers to set a good example themselves and to create expectations. The project leader must convey that gossip and lies are not accepted.

9. Take credit for other people’s work and ideas
No employee will be happy that someone else (colleague or manager) takes unfair credit for his or her work. Appreciation must radiate directly on the individual who made that contribution. Most employees do not mind sharing the honor as long as they see their own share in it being appreciated. This can lead to a lack of confidence which can ultimately be detrimental to the future.

Processes and consequences can be muddled, harmed, or even irritated in a political workplace. Political games can expand from one person to multiple roles within an organization. The essence and strength of games vary based on the level of the organization, such as improving your rank game using ‘valorant elo boosting‘. This will help you in boosting your game level.

Featured

Understanding Both Media and its connection to Politics

This policy proposal on the media builds public understanding of the standpoint appealing effects of the media, grasps opportunities and issues connected to the media, it also encourages discussions on solutions to those issues. It is something that tries.

Today, very few people, whether in our society today everyone in different industries know how to use the media. Tech professional and its other counter parts have to meet the chance and obstacles posed by the various features of social media. Rather, governments, businesses to work together to address the ever-growing social media ethical crisis and its consequences.

Social media and society

All forms of media have both the potential to amplify and solve social and political problems. The media is a channel of communication between human beings, and it may realize social goods or political goods, or it may destroy them.

Social property is a term that refers to things that are useful for social relations, such as education, clean water, medical care, safety, empathy, understanding, and community consciousness. Political goods are institutions that protect and create social goods, the rule of law, and the decision-making process.

Social media has at least six aspects (6V): volume, variety, velocity, value, veracity, and variability.

Clearly different from other media. Social media has greatly improved the ability of diverse people and groups to communicate, share information, collaborate and take joint actions without any institutional or organizational guidance (quantitative scale and diversity). sex).

Furthermore, it has become possible to spread information, images, and videos at an unprecedented speed (speed). However, the quality and type of information is extremely uncertain (value, credibility, variability).

Social media triggers emotions in the brain, making complex thinking difficult. It is the frontal lobe of the brain that governs democratic debate, critical thinking that distinguishes facts from fiction, and creative problem-solving. The work of the frontal lobe is indispensable for building society, analyzing public problems, and creating solutions and innovations that improve social and political goods and using Let’s Fly Wisely is a fun thing to use to view the sky.

Opportunities brought by social media

Since the late 1990s, many people have come to think that social and political goods can be expected to improve by connecting people through social media, gaining power, and making it easier to obtain information.

Today, almost half of the world’s population uses social media to exchange ideas, photos and videos. Governments and civil society organizations are using social media to help social and political goods in a variety of ways.

Design a platform that encourages empathy, dialogue and discussion

To change the current state of social media driving polarization and violence, tech companies seek advice from a new generation of conflict transformation experts familiar with facilitating social transformation, dialogue and social cohesion.

People working in the areas of peacebuilding and conflict transformation have special training and hands-on experience in intergroup conflict resolution procedures, coordinating complex peace processes, and coordinating communities.

Featured

Internet guiding the view of Politics

With the general increase in internet use, the potential for digital political information and political participation and structuring options via the internet increases.

The online medium opens up new potential for participation, as the user – in contrast to newspapers or television – does not have to remain solely in his role as a recipient of the information offer, but rather actively help shape the media offer and use the Internet and its services as a platform for political activity.

The new opportunities for participation and design become particularly clear with the expanded perception and use of the Internet, which are referred to with the catchphrase Web 2.0 and increasingly with the term social media.

The Internet or the World Wide Web is not only becoming a platform for the supply of many hypertext linked sites, mostly institutional providers, but is increasingly becoming an application environment for communication, interaction.

Internet use is changing to active design

In which own multimedia content is generated, networked with other users and published on portals. The range and quality of these activities exceed the possibilities of an individual, which can be seen in the importance of prominent social media platforms such as the online encyclopedia Wikipedia, the social network Facebook or the short message service Twitter.

Need to transfer some furniture?
https://www.wghsaada.com/moving-furniture-in-jeddah/

Overall, with the technological advancement of the Internet, one can potentially speak of the upgrading of the audience compared to conventional media. In any case, the creation and dissemination of content by simple users (weblogs, audio / video files, citizen journalism offers) indicates a change in the political and media area, as competition for established media players is growing.

Online information

With the Internet, citizens can easily access a quantitative and qualitative range of political information. This is offset by a lack of time resources and political disinterest on the part of the users, as well as the information overload and uncertainty about the credibility of the political online offer associated with the expansion of the offer.

In the case of special political events, the importance of online information increases. Due to the free distribution of information, the speed of online communication and the high degree of networking, spectacular news can be disseminated online at lightning speed and take effect.

Political actors

Recently made increasing use of entries in social networks or Twitter short messages to report on political events in real time and without going through journalists, although the news content is often limited.

The offer of political information includes efforts by parliaments and → administrations – especially at local level – to make political work in committees, decision-making and results transparent online and to give the population the chance to participate. In view of the general political user behavior outlined, it can be doubted whether this will increase interest in local politics.

Online communication

Online communication represents the next level of political activation after information. This refers to citizens who not only read political blogs, but also regularly write articles, chat with their MPs or want to be regularly informed about the ideas and activities of their constituency MPs.

Even if not every politician answers and only a few citizens (the portal reports 400,000 monthly visitors) take part, these portals open up the opportunity for a new transparency of parliamentary work, for direct contact between elected and voters and for a virtual memory of the Voting behavior of parliamentarians.

Featured

Numbers on the Rise: Engaging Politics Online

The Internet is playing an increasingly important role in communicating politics and in promoting political commitment among citizens. It offers new opportunities for information, communication and participation, which are used in a variety of ways, especially by young people.

Important potentials of the new medium are seen in its possible contribution to the democratization of society: through better information and participation opportunities, citizens could help shape all areas of life more actively and thus strengthen citizen-friendly democracy.

However, the development of Internet use to date also shows the danger of a “digital split” in society due to a growing gap between users and non-users. This development can create or intensify social inequalities, as the level of education, social status and gender affiliation determine the possibilities for information and political participation.

The number of Internet users is increasing every year

In 2007, 40.8 million People aged 14 and over were online (62.7%). All major parties, organizations and associations are represented on the internet, but also NGOs, associations and alternative political projects. There is a wide range of political activities on the Internet (e.g. chats with politicians, collections of signatures, web discussions), online magazines, Internet portals and information sites.

Spaces for more open communication

it potentially enables the participation and free expression of opinion for all interested parties who can communicate with like-minded and dissenters without ideological and party-political boundaries.

The structure of communication and participation appears to be more equal than real debates and traditional forms of engagement; The usual influencing factors – such as age or social status – have less weight in the virtual space.

The network offers free availability of diverse, up-to-date, inexpensive and quickly retrievable information and public access to knowledge for broad sections of the population . This enables citizens to obtain comprehensive and independent information, but also to spread their own concerns online.

The internet allows communication without time or space restrictions and defies traditional hierarchies and authorities. B. in the public communication rooms of the virtual communities, all interested parties to speak and discuss with each other.

The Internet is not only used for peaceful contact and tolerant communication

It can also support violent actions and provide a forum for content that is politically or morally questionable or prohibited (e.g. violations of the protection of minors, racism, political extremism). In addition, there are specific forms of Internet crime that are linked to the possibilities of the new medium, such as spam emails or exchange rings for child pornography.

Combating these phenomena is often difficult because the Internet crosses national borders and thus severely restricts the options for political intervention and control.

The development of the Internet and its use to date shows that the euphoric hopes for comprehensive democratization have not been fulfilled, but political processes can be more transparent and new information, communication and participation opportunities have emerged and using town planning consultants Perth for town planning and architectural design.

Featured

The New Era of Propaganda on Facebook and Instagram?

Social networks like Facebook and Instagram become self-reinforcing echo chambers. Services like Buy Instagram followers can help you gain followers and views instantly. Dissenting views and comments are excluded and filtered. Conspiracy theorists, trolls and social bots have taken command. Bouncers that filter in advance and separate garbage from opinion are missing. The Internet, controlled by a few media monopolies, has lost its innocence as the hopeful of liberal democracy.

On the future of political communication beyond personalization, profiling and populism. Do we need to correct our image of man? Since the enlightenment 250 years ago, man has been regarded as a rational being – capable of freeing himself from his self-inflicted immaturity. In an enlightened society, facts, not feelings, decide. Statistics take precedence over sentiments. The power of argument beats the mass of the mob. But thanks to the new networking opportunities through social media, millions of individuals are suddenly flocking to opinion bubbles and hate storms. Big data and social media are changing communication. In the new attention economy, the degree of excitement determines ratings and approval.

The bad news is that we must say goodbye to the utopia of a global electronic democracy. The good news is that we do not have to capitulate to the dystopia of electronic populism and its post-factual propaganda.

HYPER-INDIVIDUALIZATION LEADS TO THE DISSOLUTION OF THE ELECTORATE

Classical political communication is struggling with the trend of self-swelling campaign communication. It usually sends a message to all citizens. Where governments do not communicate with their citizens in a modern and targeted manner, these alternative sources of information turn to. More and more people are learning about social media and less about mass media such as television and newspapers.

DOES SOCIAL MEDIA MAKE THE STATE POWERLESS?

In many countries, calls are increasing for state intervention against false news. Politicians are putting pressure on and have called on some social networks to crack down on hate comments and fake news. Facebook has already acted. An NGO is now fighting “fake news”. The approach is similar to the fight against windmills. The German Greens are even calling for a labelling requirement for social bots, in order to prevent programs that pretend to be real people on social media. The boundaries between opinions, facts and misinformation are often fluid. The post-factual age will not be overcome by state and entrepreneurial means alone. Behind them lies a pessimistic image of the electorate that is easy to manipulate.

Can elections be won in the future with the help of digital manipulation? The election winners and their strategists and service providers would like to make us believe this. Resistance would then be futile. But propaganda only works in the long run in a dictatorship. Humans are not machines. Their political preferences cannot be measured with the help of algorithms from measurement data, however precise they may be. Not Facebook and Google are to blame for filter bubbles and hate speech, man is it. The loss of trust in politics and the media is deeper. The hatred and the bubbles have existed before. The new propaganda machines are symptoms and accelerators, but not causes of the post-factual renaissance of a society of ignorance.

Featured

How it changed the Game: Internet & Politics

The widespread use of new information and communication technologies is today one of the fundamental factors of world development. The global Internet, as a fundamentally new interactive communication channel, plays an essential role in all spheres of society, including political. Information and communication technologies today open up new effective means of communication between citizens, political institutions and government.

In this regard, the study of Internet technologies of political communications, addressed directly to public opinion, mass consciousness, and the political behavior of large groups of people and individuals, seems to be especially relevant.

Most of the politicians

Created network projects did not believe that the use of Internet technologies would bring them any practical benefits. This stereotype led to the emergence of many Internet resources, the owners of which did not quite understand why they needed them. Visually and substantively, such sites were, as a rule, of the same average quality, since they were created according to the same template by non-professional developers.

After the owner of the resource lost the initial interest in the Internet (which was often associated with disappointment in new technologies, but in reality – with the loss of faith in the myth about the Internet), such sites were closed, as happened with most of the online representations of political figures after the elections.

The rapid development of the information and political sector of the Internet in the early 2000s made the Network a full-fledged source of information, a working tool for journalists.

Need to know reviews of websites?
https://www.youreviewit.com/tutorials/

The advantage of Internet communication is feedback, which has become so rare in political public relations using traditional communication channels. It is obvious that representatives of the ruling party are practically absolute leaders in terms of their presence in the “traditional” media space, primarily television.

Political Internet communications

Are becoming an increasingly important player on the political scene. Options for the presence of political relations with the public on the Internet: sites of a political party, bloc, politicians; e-mailing; Forums, online conferences; chats, internet ratings, e-voting, blogs, social networks, video hosting (YouTube).

In today’s reality, no self-respecting political candidate can ignore social media. It is necessary for a politician to be present on the Big Four networks: Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Flickr. As the world’s most popular and fastest growing networks, they represent four different ways to publish information and connect with voters:

The use of social media resources

It is the main direction in the development of political relations with the public on the Internet. Moreover, new technologies lead to the gradual formation of a new style of public relations based on a genuine dialogue between civil society and the authorities.

It is obvious that Internet technologies are gradually becoming one of the most important tools of political communication, at the same time serving as a criterion for a democratic political process and a guarantee of the successful development of civil society institutions.

Featured

Turning the Tide: Election Campaigns

Election campaigns can only be carried out from the time the candidacy notification is received on the public (notification) day to the day before the election day. Even during this period, it is said that repeated calls and street speeches in election campaign cars will be held from 8:00 am to 8:00 pm. Election campaigns during other periods are prohibited.

Even though the elections haven’t started, the sound trucks are spinning around. Isn’t it illegal?

Depending on the content and timing of the sound truck, it will be judged as an election campaign or a political activity. Election campaigns are only possible during the campaign period. Political activity is restricted during the campaign period, but in principle there is no restriction during the rest of the period. The police will crack down on election campaign violations.

The voices of campaign cars and street speeches are noisy

The period and method of election campaigns are determined by law, and it is permissible to make a series of street speeches and names using the loudspeakers of election campaign vehicles.

In fact, it is sometimes criticized for being noisy, but for candidates, it is also trying to appeal to voters within the limits stipulated by law, so please understand the voters during the campaign period. I would like to ask. In addition, it is said that tranquility must be maintained around schools, hospitals, clinics and other medical facilities.

A politician official came to my house saying, “I want you to become a member of the supporters’ association,” but isn’t it an election violation?

Purely solicitation to join the supporters’ association is allowed as a political activity. However, if it is held during the election campaign period, there is a high possibility that it will be an election violation, and if it is held just before the election even if it is not during the election campaign period, there is a risk of election violation as a preliminary campaign.

Want to download convert things to mp3 & mp4?
Then this can be of help –
https://keepv.id/

I put an election campaign poster on the wall without permission. Can I remove it myself?

The Public Offices Election Law stipulates that posters should be placed on the land, buildings, etc. of others after obtaining the consent of the resident. It is stipulated that the resident may peel off the poster attached without the permission of the resident.

Make sure that no one in your family has consented before peeling. Regarding the disposal of posters after peeling off, there is also a problem of property rights, so it is better to contact the camp and have them pick it up.

Prohibition of providing food and drink

Regarding election campaigns, it is prohibited for candidates to provide to candidates and campaigners, as well as to provide to candidates and campaigners. However, tea and commonly used sweets and fruits are excluded. We can also provide a certain number of bento boxes to give to campaigners.

Featured

Is Everything Political Or Non-Political?

You can read the title of my weblog in two ways. Yes or no with the brackets. How you read this may depend on how you are in public administration or how you view politics. And that is not very strange. Both movements occur among administrators and politicians.

 

Are you interested also in how you take care of your beard? visit ‘Was fördert den Bartwuch‘ for more details.

Everything is political
On the one hand, there are the politicians for whom everything is political. On the one hand, they make use of compelling visions, but also regularly make use of pre-hopeless motions. After all, symbolic politics is also political. Or make politics of agendas and procedures. Policy continuity is not important to them. If it is more convenient to change course, it will. Everything is political. This is often tiring and disruptive and that is sometimes the very goal of the politicians involved. For them, politics is not the means, but the end.

Not everything is political
On the other hand, there are politicians who emphasize that not everything is political. For them, there are fixed values, fundamental principles, and lines within which a politician operates and which people want to adhere to. Governance continuity is of paramount importance to these politicians. They name subjects and seize moments that transcend politics. They put the rule of law and good governance first in their actions and they also want to keep the debate in order. These politicians apply a kind of political hygiene.

Consistency of policy
Neither of these two styles is left or right. These styles can be found on both sides of the political spectrum. Yet the style in which ‘everything is political’ is dominant is not good for our country, provinces and municipalities. Inhabitants need stability, reliability, perspective, and trust-inspiring leadership. Not a street fight or ‘village politics’. This requires a certain consistency of policy and a certain distance from the issues of the day. And exactly this also applies to the relationships between the levels of government.

Dealing with administrative structure and financial system agreements
Financial and administrative relationships require care, consistency, and restraint. Yes, political principles prevail over technocratic implementation. Yes, that can and must be tinkered with a certain regularity. Yes, system agreements must also go along and be adapted to the times in which we live. However, taking an opportunistic approach to administrative structure and financial system agreements quickly leads to cluttered up and – political or financial – accidents and, at some point, an inevitable failure of policy or problems in implementation. Everyone knows from their own domestic experience: if you do not regularly clean up the shed and just mess around, there is only one option waiting at any time: the big cleaning. There is much more to it than just keeping it in order.

Decentralization and the financial system
In the meantime, the sounds are getting louder: the decentralization in its current form is stagnating (SCP) or, according to some, rattling on all sides(Foundation decentralized administration). In addition to all the otherwise good analyzes that apply to this, in my view, this also has everything to do with the hasty transfer in 2015, the enormous budgetary interventions that went with it, and the political capriciousness with which the decentralization had to contend in recent years on both policy and financial level. Depending on the political whims, interim interventions in policy were or were not taken. And depending on what did or did not ‘work out’ politically, they decided on (usually no) money. Too little policy space for municipalities and too little money for the requested task performance. That does not go well for long. Meanwhile, the administrative and financial system is squeaking and creaking at the seams.

Featured

Politicians | Political Statement With Their Clothing

Everything has been thought about: from the color tie to rolling up sleeves. Together with image expert Zabeth van Veen, we check out the outfits of some of our own politicians.

Days like Prinsjesdag are the perfect opportunity to make a political statement through looks and clothing. For example, Carla Dik-Faber (CU) wore a dress made of old train seat upholstery in 2015 to draw attention to recycled material and sustainable public transport. In 2018, Esther Ouwehand (PvdD) wore a dress with 1,200 crosses that represented the 1,200 animals slaughtered every minute in the Netherlands. But statements are made with clothing not only during Prinsjesdag, this also happens during debates in the House of Representatives.

The blue suit
We often see politicians appear in a blue suit. Why exactly that color? “Blue subconsciously gives a feeling of reliability. That is why pilots and the navy often wear this color, ”explains image expert Zabeth van Veen. The examination of the California State University shows that in Western countries is very important in contrast clothing. For example, a dark blue suit with a white shirt radiates authority. In other countries, completely different rules apply when it comes to color.

Ties
Not only the suit but also the tie is considered. For example, have you ever noticed that Mark Rutte (VVD) never wears a red tie, but Geert Wilders (PVV) and Pieter Heerma (CDA) do? “Red is the color of the PvdA, but it is also a color that requires attention. Do you want the eyes on you? Then you choose red. ” According to Zabeth, you unconsciously look first at the person with a red tie. “Research has also shown that 80 percent of people consider a person with a dark blue suit, a white shirt, and a red tie to be the most decisive and effective leader.”

Clothing as a marketing tool
If we zoom in on the personal clothing choices of politicians, we quickly arrive at the set that Mark Rutte has been wearing for years when he meets the people. Arjen Lubach has already made an item about this. When Rutte goes on a campaign, he almost always ‘buy‘ and wears a light shirt, a hoodie, and a blue padded jacket. “Rutte looks a bit like the average student. If he would look extremely fashionable, people would immediately think: why does he have time for that. Actually, you can never do it right.”

Turtleneck and rolled up sleeves
Another thing that we see more and more among politicians lately is wearing a turtleneck sweater in combination with a jacket. We saw this among others with Farid Azarkan (DENK) and Jesse Klaver (GL). “It’s winter, of course, but a turtleneck sweater also radiates intellect. Consider, for example, Steve Jobs. It suits GroenLinks and Klaver can take it well.”

The sneakers from Kaag
Finally, we must also talk about the clothing of women in the House of Representatives. Zabeth is convinced that women should earn more than men when you consider the clothes that need to be purchased. “Men have a few suits and shirts and then it’s okay. Women are viewed much more critically. If a woman puts on the same outfit five times in two weeks or if their hair is not in the right place, the reaction is much more violent.”

Outstanding colors
Another thing that stands out is that women often wear colorful clothes. Just look at Lilianne Ploumen (PvdA), Esther Ouwehand, Corrie van Brenk (50Plus) or Lilian Marijnissen (SP). “That way you can stand out, but politicians have to be careful with bright colors. Striking colors look very good with Lilianne Ploumen, but with Lilian Marijnissen it could just be that the colors run away with her, so to speak. That has to do with what color type you are. That all works very technically.”

Featured

Way to Do Market Research

Factors of Market Research

Demographic factor
The number of inhabitants of a country, region or city, their age, income, occupation, marital status all these demographic elements can influence your marketing, sales, pricing and distribution policy. If you sell comfort products for the third age, you have to check in a market how many people belong to your target group and how wealthy they are. The aging population in many countries will, for example, increase the demand for certain medicines and orthopedic products.

Economic factors
Important economic factors to investigate are government debt and the country’s main sources of income. It is also a good idea to find out how and with which trade organizations and partners the country is connected. Flemish organizations can help you on the spot with specific market mechanisms and specificities. Are they present? And if you will be professionally active there, which tax system applies and what salary scales can you expect? The country’s growth figures is the country showing and what are the forecasts.

Social and cultural factors
Check the number of working hours, breaks, customs and habits, the importance of corporate social responsibility, sustainability, child labor, leisure activities and interest groups. In many countries, English is the business language, but you should not assume that it is the case everywhere. There is a time difference with almost all emerging countries. Be sure to check which standards and values ​​are relevant to your export plans. The local culture can have a very big impact on your sales and activities locally. It’s important to know the culture and religion of the country you are moving to.

Technological factors
New technologies lead to new products and processes. Smartphones, navigation devices and HD televisions are the result of technological advancements. E-commerce and QR codes are evolutions in the way we do business, thanks to improved technology. Technology reduce costs, improve quality and lead to innovation. These developments have advantages for the business world and for the consumer. For example, the use of ICT for orders and payments leads to less work and fewer errors.

Ecological factors
Environmental analysis mainly involves analyzing weather patterns and climate cycles. During the rainy season, certain transport systems are not active in some regions. During periods of extreme drought, boats and ships cannot navigate the waterways. These cyclical weather patterns have a greater impact in developing countries, where transport infrastructure still needs to be modernized. The growing desire to protect nature and the environment is influencing the development of new products such as fuel-efficient cars.

Are you looking for tried-and-true products?

Here is a path to ‘velgenklere.no‘ where you can see what products have been thoroughly tested.

Political and Legal Factors

Political Factors
The political system helps shape the economy. The degree to which the government of your target market interferes with business has profound implications for your export plans. Be sure to check the attitude towards foreign investors. In some countries there are non-tariff barriers such as embargoes, which can seriously hinder your activities. Cumbersome bureaucracy and corruption make obtaining certificates or permits a hell of a job. A favorable tax policy might win you over.

Legal factors
New laws and regulations are changing the behavior of companies. What regulations will the exporting country subject you to as a foreign organization? The legal factors apply in different areas:

  • Consumer Protection
  • Competition Law
  • Labor Law
  • Health and Safety Legislation
  • Trade Policy Measures
  • Importing Tax
Featured

Why Is It Necessary To Pay For Election Programs?

Today, the mathematicians of the Central Planning Board present the calculation of the election programs. They did so for the first time in 1986 and now, 35 years later, it is an almost indispensable aspect of the campaign. But how useful is this tradition?

Are you looking for a game while you are watching a debate? visit https://online-solitaire.com/freecell

This year, 10 parties voluntarily made use of the CPB’s math skills: VVD, CDA, D66, GroenLinks, SP, PvdA, ChristenUnie, SGP, Denk and 50Plus. 2000 measures taken by the parties have been calculated and this shows that these parties mainly want to spend more money. This increases purchasing power, as does the budget deficit and the national debt. Our children and grandchildren will pay for this, the CPB said this morning. The PVV, the Party for the Animals, and the Forum for Democracy do not do this for several reasons.

Non-relevant

“The calculations are useful for indicating direction, but should not lead to discussions,” says Sweder van Wijnbergen, an economist at the University of Amsterdam. During Kok’s first cabinet, he was also secretary-general at the Ministry of Economic Affairs. He explains that the parties are now using the calculations in debates in order to find a better solution themselves. “Since the first calculation years ago, politicians have been using those statistics as a foundation for the discussion. Then, for example, in such a debate a politician brings up that his party will provide 2,000 more jobs. Those numbers are not important at all,” he said. it must be about the content. ”

Estimates

There is an enormous margin of uncertainty about the calculations of the CPB. “The models used for the calculation are so large that they contain many estimates. The CPB itself indicates that, by the way.” The advantages in numbers that politicians stroll with during these debates are therefore not at all accurate or relevant, says Van Wijnbergen.

Abuse

In addition, the models used for the calculation are not completely public. “I don’t like that about the calculations. I think it should be more transparent, now the calculations cannot be checked.” Van Wijnbergen thinks that this is because the calculations will probably be criticized. “They are not waiting for that.” Another disadvantage of the calculation, according to Van Wijnbergen, is that sometimes abuse is made of the calculation. “The parties now know what they need to respond to. The parties then coordinate their measures in such a way that they get the desired results from the CPB calculation. That is good for the campaign.”

Effects

Apart from adjusting the measures, it is almost never the case that the calculation actually had an influence on the outcome of the elections, says Van Wijnbergen. The parties that decide not to participate in the calculation will not notice this much in the long term either. But that parties that do not do it, such as the PVV and the Party for the Animals, are viewed critically when choosing not to participate, Van Wijnbergen does not think so. “You can go to a party for that. If a party says: ‘I am not participating’, it actually shows that the plans may not yet be concrete enough and that sends the signal that the party does not know what they are going to do.”

Realistic plans

The most important argument for the calculation is that it forces politicians to make the election program concrete. “That is a big plus of the calculation. The parties have to make realistic plans, otherwise, it will become clear during the calculation.” If it were up to Van Wijnbergen, the tradition of calculating can therefore remain. “But more emphasis should be placed on the fact that they are just numbers, and that those numbers are only an indication, which can certainly be wrong.” Incidentally, we should not expect that from politics, says Van Wijnbergen. “We can continue to expect them to pay attention if, according to the calculation, their party really does generate more jobs, whether that is an indication or not.”

Elections | There’s A Lot Of Promises But Little Is Fulfilled

In an election battle, it is not who is right that counts, but who is right. This sometimes makes campaigns and debates entertainment, but more often a source of great irritation. Logic loses out to rhetoric. But as an audience, this is partly our own fault, because we determine what scores. A series by philosopher Arno Bouwes on logic and illogic in election time.

A good election slogan does not repel potential voters, it attracts them. The best slogans that they will print using the best printers such as ‘printer for avery labels‘ are a mirror in which everyone can see their own preferences reflected. The PvdA wants to “Move forward together. Let’s build the Netherlands together that everyone can be proud of”, D’66 “gets it done. Good work, good education, good care” and for the VVD it’s about “Normal. Doing it. . ” They are slogans that you can hardly disagree with, because moving forward, normal and good can mean something different for everyone. Even with many points of view, you can only agree. Hugo Borst visited all political parties and discovered to his great surprise that they all really want the same thing: good care. But of course, the party that strives for bad care, bad work, and bad education has yet to be founded. In the run-up to the elections, there is, therefore, a lot of shouting, but little said. Precisely because it is too little about the content, politicians talk about each other too often. Rutte lies, Buma is a pouting toddler, Jesse Klaver is a bad imitation of Obama and Wilders is insipid and indecent. The other is no good, but this doesn’t tell me who to vote for.

Everyone wants a better, just society that you can be proud of. But what does this look like? Nobody wants ambulance personnel to be abused, annoying neighbors, pollution, or heavy taxes. But how do we achieve this and what do we sacrifice for this? In other words: what are the choices we will soon face as a voter? If you are in doubt about who to vote for, you can start by asking yourself the following two questions: 1. What are the parties saying about their own content? And especially 2. Do they say something that you can also disagree with? A statement that you cannot disagree with is almost always meaningless.

The problem with meaningless positions is that political policy must eventually become concrete. The content comes later and with it the disagreement, division, and disappointment. The care plan will not get off the ground like this, Elke1 will simply become everyone for himself again and the new prime minister will (again) turn out to be a disappointment. You had imagined something different about “the Netherlands you can be proud of.” So let’s hope for election debates with propositions and substantiation that you can wholeheartedly agree with, but especially disagree with so that there is a clear choice in the elections.

Featured

Seniors And Politicians Conversation

BARENDRECHT – Representatives of all seven parties participating in the municipal elections in Barendrecht entered into a debate on Wednesday. They did this during the political afternoon of senior citizens’ associations KBO and PCOB. The venue was De Ontmoeting, which was occupied to the last seat.

Arie Slob (PCOB) managed the afternoon in a relaxed manner. The representatives were given three minutes to introduce themselves and their party to the seniors who arrived. Ada Dekker did this for GroenLinks, Arjan Stolk on behalf of SGP-CU, Ed Mol on behalf of PvdA, Marianne Tijssen on behalf of D66, Simon Kelder on behalf of VVD, Peter Luijendijk on behalf of CDA and Lennart van der Linden on behalf of Echt for Barendrecht.

Then the audience was given the opportunity to ask questions. Important themes this afternoon were safety, (public) transport, the Service Center, a vacancy on the Middenbaan, and housing. But the first question was about the BAR collaboration and was put to Lennart van der Linden. He said that EVB is against merging. “We think cooperation is very important, but this model is not the perfect solution. We believe that part of the services should come back to Barendrecht. “Ed Mol responded clearly:” Getting out of the BAR cooperation is a completely idiotic plan. We finally have the tent in order. It has been researched: it works fine. ” Simon Kelder added by saying that merging is absolutely out of the question.

There was also talk of free public transport for people over 65, which all parties are enthusiastic about. It was mainly mentioned that there should be more stops and that the connection between old Barendrecht and Carnisselande should be much better. Peter Luijendijk about this: The local bus that will soon be running, really goes through the neighborhoods, so it will partly tackle that problem. ” Marianne Tijssen called on the seniors to let them know what they are missing or to raise this with RET themselves. , which covers the stops, among other things.

Another topic of discussion was the Service Center, where seniors can no longer go. But there is no alternative either. Ada Dekker indicated that a lot is planned where meetings will be possible in the future. One option is to create a meeting space in Borgstede if it receives a quality boost. Luijendijk gave the tip to approach the many schools in the neighborhoods. “They are open to outside users and often have an auditorium that is very suitable.”
The accessibility of the police also turned out to be a concern. Marianne Tijssen said that in the regional consultation it was stated that there is a need for more police officers in Barendrecht, but that the municipality is not about the police. The option to use BOAs and become a volunteer at Neighborhood Prevention was mentioned.

Finally, a lot of attention was paid to housing for seniors and modifications to the home. The lack of transparency of the WMO policy was discussed. And the question of why so many owner-occupied apartments in the high segment are being added was heard from several angles. There is now hardly anything available for the group that just missed out on social housing. Ed Mol about this: “There is no long-term vision. The strategy has always been to opt for expensive projects. And we are afraid of going up in Barendrecht, but such buildings can solve the problems. ” Van der Linden added that much social housing will also be built at the locations on the Botter and the Oude Postkantoor. If your senior love ones are having difficulty to walk you can buy and ‘choose the best narrow walkers for seniors‘ for them.

American Suffrage


The United States of America has been the Capitol of the world beginning at the end of World War 2 where it stood as a testimony towards freedom and liberty. However, unbeknownst to many of us, voting rights for everyone in the US of A isn’t as inclusive as it is today not until the 1960s. Today, let’s find out in this short TedTalk how did the USA fare towards a better and real Universal Suffrage.