Artificial intelligence would have a greater impact on our society as a result of digitization. Several countries, including the United States and China, are currently leading the way in artificial intelligence research and development.
Artificial intelligence will only become popular in coming years, and it will be used by the politics. Of course, this will help to increase the political participation of all people in society, especially those who are only politically involved to a small degree. This is helpful in the political process.
Concurrently, the internet has a technologies that the Committee is rightly critical. This is particularly true of techniques that can be used to sway elections. The use of these strategies slows down, if not completely destroys, the political process. It concerns, for example, delivering personalized election ads to particular individuals, persuading groups of electors to cross the bridge with selective claims, or filtering information within those platforms without being heard. Fake news, or “deep-fake,” in which video clips are manipulated, often plays a part in the spread of misinformation in society.
The plea for more transparency of the committee, especially on the side of political parties, or those participating in the elections participating is important. The question remains whether some recommendations have an effect. We must also consider that certain organizations or companies can also operate from abroad. When it comes to algorithms, things get a bit more difficult, especially when it comes to self-learning systems.
The question is whether we can use a platform for the dissemination of political information. It has become clear that borders sometimes are difficult to draw, while a mistake is easily made. Mots importantly the side of society is aware and deliberated.
As the Committee correctly pointed out, the internet makes this much more informal, which can lead to polarization of opinion forming. One claims that one of them is more deliberation and comprehension of other viewpoints. “They like to increase understanding of the effect of digitization on our opinion creation.”
Watch: How the Internet is Changing Politics
A process in which different supporters and opponents explain their positions and describe their objectives. Participate rather than refusing to distribute flyers. It’s important that there’s a discussion such that the end result isn’t a statistical equation, like discussing in using ‘rapid‘ application development . As a result, They recommend that all referendum outcomes that are negative have no effect on the matter. In that situation, the dispute will continue, with a new vote likely being held within a year. The exact bandwidth and elaboration are also up for debate. It is the referendum outcomes that are reinforcing the social contrasts. As a result, They argue for a single binding outcome that only happens if a large portion of the political action.